Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Annbar Associates Vs. West Side Redevelopment Corp.

Annbar Associates vs West Side Redevelopment Corp.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-10-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101318

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 5
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Annbar Associates

Respondent

West Side Redevelopment Corp.

Excerpt

annbar associates v. west side redevelopment corp. - 385 u.s. 5 (1966) u.s. supreme court annbar associates v. west side redevelopment corp., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 annbar associates et al. v. west side redevelopment corp. et al. appeal from the supreme court of missouri. no. 152. decided october 10, 1966. 397 s. w. 2d 635, appeal dismissed. william m. kufeld for appellants. guy w. rice for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. glick v. ballentine produce inc., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court glick v. ballentine produce inc., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 glick et al. v. ballentine produce inc., et al. appeal from the supreme court of missouri. no. 168. decided october 10, 1966. 396 s. w. 2d 609, appeal dismissed. elwyn l. cady, jr., for appellants. morris h. kross, john r. caslavka, harry p. thomson, jr., and e. e. thompson for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 385 u.s. 5, 6

Full Judgment

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. - 385 U.S. 5 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 152.
Decided October 10, 1966.

397 S. W. 2d 635, appeal dismissed.

William M. Kufeld for appellants.

Guy W. Rice for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., <a href="/101318"> 385 U.S. 5 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 5 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

GLICK ET AL. v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1966.

396 S. W. 2d 609, appeal dismissed.

Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants.

Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 5, 6



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial