Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Little Vs. Rhay

Little vs Rhay

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-14-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101298

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 96
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Little

Respondent

Rhay

Excerpt

little v. rhay - 385 u.s. 96 (1966) u.s. supreme court little v. rhay, 385 u.s. 96 (1966) 385 u.s. 96 little v. rhay, penitentiary superintendent. appeal from the supreme court of washington. no. 669, misc. decided november 14, 1966. 68 wash. 2d 353, 413 p.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. francis conklin for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 385 u.s. 96, 97 board satanta joint r. h. sch. v. haskell cty. plan., 385 u.s. 96 (1966) 385 u.s. 96 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court board satanta joint r. h. sch. v. haskell cty. plan., 385 u.s. 96 (1966) 385 u.s. 96 board of satanta joint rural high school, district no. 2, et al. v. haskell county planning board et al. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 560. decided november 14, 1966. 197 kan. 321, 416 p.2d 791, appeal dismissed. dale m. stucky for appellants. robert c. londerholm, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Full Judgment

LITTLE v. RHAY - 385 U.S. 96 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court LITTLE v. RHAY, 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96

LITTLE v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 669, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.

68 Wash. 2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Francis Conklin for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 96, 97


BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., <a href="/101298"> 385 U.S. 96 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 96 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96

BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 2, ET AL. v.
HASKELL COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 560.
Decided November 14, 1966.

197 Kan. 321, 416 P.2d 791, appeal dismissed.

Dale M. Stucky for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial