Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hall Vs. Illinois

Hall vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101210

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
380 U.S. 250
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hall

Respondent

illinois

Excerpt

hall v. illinois - 380 u.s. 250 (1965) u.s. supreme court hall v. illinois, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 hall v. illinois. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 848, misc. decided march 8, 1965. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 380 u.s. 250, 251 arthur v. colorado, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court arthur v. colorado, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 arthur v. colorado. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of colorado. no. 486, misc. decided march 8, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 155 colo. 188, 393 p.2d 371. edward c. king for petitioner. duke w. dunbar, attorney general of colorado, frank e. hickey, deputy attorney general, and john e. bush, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 ; pickelsimer v. wainwright, 375 u.s. 2 .

Full Judgment

HALL v. ILLINOIS - 380 U.S. 250 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250

HALL v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 848, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 250, 251


ARTHUR v. COLORADO, <a href="/101210"> 380 U.S. 250 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250

ARTHUR v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371.

Edward C. King for petitioner.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2 .



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial