Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hall Vs. Illinois

Hall vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101210
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
380 U.S. 250

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hall

Respondent

illinois

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes — an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed — then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

hall v. illinois - 380 u.s. 250 (1965) u.s. supreme court hall v. illinois, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 hall v. illinois. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 848, misc. decided march 8, 1965. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 380 u.s. 250, 251 arthur v. colorado, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court arthur v. colorado, 380 u.s. 250 (1965) 380 u.s. 250 arthur v. colorado. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of colorado. no. 486, misc. decided march 8, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 155 colo. 188, 393 p.2d 371. edward c. king for petitioner. duke w. dunbar, attorney general of colorado, frank e. hickey, deputy attorney general, and john e. bush, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petiti

Full Judgment

HALL v. ILLINOIS - 380 U.S. 250 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HALL v. ILLINOIS, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250

HALL v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 848, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 250, 251


ARTHUR v. COLORADO, <a href="/101210"> 380 U.S. 250 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965) 380 U.S. 250

ARTHUR v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371.

Edward C. King for petitioner.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2 .




AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial