Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Chicago Vs. United States

Chicago vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-29-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
380 U.S. 373
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chicago

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

chicago v. united states - 380 u.s. 373 (1965) u.s. supreme court chicago v. united states, 380 u.s. 373 (1965) 380 u.s. 373 chicago, rock island & pacific railroad co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of missouri. no. 770. decided march 29, 1965. 233 f. supp. 381, affirmed. m. l. cassell and don mcdevitt for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, donald l. hardison, robert w. ginnane and fritz r. kahn for the united states et al. alexander b. hawes for waterways bulk transportation council, inc.; nuel d. belnap for federal barge lines, inc., et al.; charles j. mccarthy for tennessee valley authority; donald macleay for arrow transportation co.; and john c. lovett for farmers union grain terminal association et al. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 380 u.s. 373, 374

Full Judgment

CHICAGO v. UNITED STATES - 380 U.S. 373 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court CHICAGO v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 373 (1965) 380 U.S. 373

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 770.
Decided March 29, 1965.

233 F. Supp. 381, affirmed.

M. L. Cassell and Don McDevitt for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Donald L. Hardison, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al. Alexander B. Hawes for Waterways Bulk Transportation Council, Inc.; Nuel D. Belnap for Federal Barge Lines, Inc., et al.; Charles J. McCarthy for Tennessee Valley Authority; Donald Macleay for Arrow Transportation Co.; and John C. Lovett for Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 380 U.S. 373, 374



Continue Your Research

Same Parties Chicago vs United States Same Subject Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous Solicitor general attorney general district court supreme court per curiam

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales