Abernathy Vs. Alabama

Abernathy vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-05-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101185

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101185
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-05-1965
Case Number: 380 U.S. 447
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abernathy

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

abernathy v. alabama - 380 u.s. 447 (1965) u.s. supreme court abernathy v. alabama, 380 u.s. 447 (1965) 380 u.s. 447 abernathy et al. v. alabama. certiorari to the court of appeals of alabama. no. 9. argued october 12-13, 1964. decided april 5, 1965. 42 ala. app. 149, 155 so.2d 586, reversed. louis h. pollak argued the cause for petitioners. with him on the brief were jack greenberg, constance baker motley, james m. nabrit iii, fred d. gray and charles s. conley. leslie hall, assistant attorney general of alabama, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama. per curiam. the judgments are reversed. boynton v. virginia, 364 u.s. 454 . mr. justice black and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 380 u.s. 447, 448

Full Judgment

ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA - 380 U.S. 447 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 447 (1965) 380 U.S. 447

ABERNATHY ET AL. v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 9.
Argued October 12-13, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.

42 Ala. App. 149, 155 So.2d 586, reversed.

Louis H. Pollak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray and Charles S. Conley.

Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 447, 448

Same Parties Abernathy vs Alabama Same Subject Contract