Binumon.S. Vs. State of Kerala

Binumon.S. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 28, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1011571

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1011571
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Babu Mathew P.Joseph
Decided On: Dec 28, 2012
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Binumon.S.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....village, kollam district. by advs.sri.r.suraj kumar sri.m.kishorkumar sri.sajith c.george sri.sunil j.chakkalackal respondents(s): --------------- 1. state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam.2. the sub inspector of police, karunagappally police station, kollam district-691001. r by public prosecutor sri. rajesh vijayan. this bail application having been finally heard on 28-12-2012, the court on the same day passed the following: babu mathew p.joseph, j ------------------------------------ b.a. no. 9594 of 2012 ------------------------------------- dated this the 28th day of december, 2012 order this petition is filed under section 438 of cr.p.c. for anticipatory bail.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned public prosecutor appearing for the respondents.3. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners apprehend arrest by karunagapally police on an accusation of having committed a non bailable offence. he further submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence at all.4. learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submits that no case has been registered by karunagapally police against the petitioners. therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners that they would be arrested by karunagapaly police has no basis. in view of the submissions so made by the learned public b.a. no. 9594 of 2012 -:2:- prosecutor, this petition does not survive. therefore, recording the submissions made by the learned public prosecutor, this petition is closed. babu mathew p.joseph, judge ul/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 7TH POUSHA 193 Bail Appl..No. 9594 of 2012 () ------------------------------ (KARUNAGAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED(S): ---------------------- 1. BINUMON.S., AGED 2 YEARS S/O DHANAPALAN, ALUMMOOTIL VEEDU, PANDARATHURUTHU, CHERIYAZHEEKKAL P.O. KARUNAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

2. DHANAPALAN,AGED 5 YEARS S/O CHELLAN PILLAI, ALUMMOOTIL VEEDU, PANDARATHURUTHU, CHERIYAZHEEKKAL P.O. KARUNAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

3. SISUPALINI, AGED 5 YEARS, ALUMMOOTIL VEEDU, PANDARATHURUTHU, CHERIYAZHEEKKAL P.O. KARUNAGAPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SRI.M.KISHORKUMAR SRI.SAJITH C.GEORGE SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL RESPONDENTS(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH Court OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691001. R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, J ------------------------------------ B.A. NO. 9594 of 2012 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of December, 2012 ORDER

This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners apprehend arrest by Karunagapally Police on an accusation of having committed a non bailable offence. He further submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence at all.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that no case has been registered by Karunagapally Police against the petitioners. Therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners that they would be arrested by Karunagapaly Police has no basis. In view of the submissions so made by the learned Public B.A. No. 9594 of 2012 -:2:- Prosecutor, this petition does not survive. Therefore, recording the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed. BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JUDGE ul/-

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2012 Same Parties Binumon.S. vs State of Kerala Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Babu Mathew P.Joseph