Skip to content
How to use Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

O'Connell vs. Manning

O'Connell vs Manning

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-17-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101141
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
381 U.S. 277

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O'Connell

Respondent

Manning

Bonus Feature

AI Studio

Get a comprehensive AI Brief with 18 structured sections - case summary, facts, prior history, citations, ratio, acts, and more - plus case-scoped chat. Brief the matter in minutes, not hours.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

How to use AI Studio (bonus feature)
  1. Open a judgment with AI Studio on your plan.
  2. Click Open AI Studio on the case page.
  3. Review the AI Brief and ask questions in Ask the judgment - verify against the full text.

Excerpt

o'connell v. manning - 381 u.s. 277 (1965) u.s. supreme court o'connell v. manning, 381 u.s. 277 (1965) 381 u.s. 277 o'connell et al. v. manning et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 454. decided may 17, 1965. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 455, american airlines, inc. v. manning et al., also on certiorari to the same court. judgment vacated and cases remanded to district court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot. reported below: 329 f.2d 11 . martin c. seham for petitioners in no. 454. arthur m. wisehart for petitioner in no. 455. asher w. schwartz and walter n. kaufman for respondents in both cases. per curiam. the motions of the petitioners to vacate are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is vacated and the cases are remanded to the united states district court for the southern district of new york with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 381 u.s. 277, 278

Full Judgment

O'CONNELL v. MANNING - 381 U.S. 277 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court O'CONNELL v. MANNING, 381 U.S. 277 (1965) 381 U.S. 277

O'CONNELL ET AL. v. MANNING ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 454.
Decided May 17, 1965. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 455, American Airlines, Inc. v. Manning et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

Judgment vacated and cases remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 11 .

Martin C. Seham for petitioners in No. 454.

Arthur M. Wisehart for petitioner in No. 455.

Asher W. Schwartz and Walter N. Kaufman for respondents in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions of the petitioners to vacate are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 381 U.S. 277, 278




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial