Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

O'Connell vs. Manning

O'Connell vs Manning

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-17-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101141

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
381 U.S. 277
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O'Connell

Respondent

Manning

Excerpt

o'connell v. manning - 381 u.s. 277 (1965) u.s. supreme court o'connell v. manning, 381 u.s. 277 (1965) 381 u.s. 277 o'connell et al. v. manning et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 454. decided may 17, 1965. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 455, american airlines, inc. v. manning et al., also on certiorari to the same court. judgment vacated and cases remanded to district court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot. reported below: 329 f.2d 11 . martin c. seham for petitioners in no. 454. arthur m. wisehart for petitioner in no. 455. asher w. schwartz and walter n. kaufman for respondents in both cases. per curiam. the motions of the petitioners to vacate are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is vacated and the cases are remanded to the united states district court for the southern district of new york with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 381 u.s. 277, 278

Full Judgment

O'CONNELL v. MANNING - 381 U.S. 277 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court O'CONNELL v. MANNING, 381 U.S. 277 (1965) 381 U.S. 277

O'CONNELL ET AL. v. MANNING ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 454.
Decided May 17, 1965. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 455, American Airlines, Inc. v. Manning et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

Judgment vacated and cases remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 11 .

Martin C. Seham for petitioners in No. 454.

Arthur M. Wisehart for petitioner in No. 455.

Asher W. Schwartz and Walter N. Kaufman for respondents in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions of the petitioners to vacate are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 381 U.S. 277, 278



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial