Fox Vs. United States

Fox vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-01-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101123

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101123
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-01-1965
Case Number: 381 U.S. 436
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fox

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

fox v. united states - 381 u.s. 436 (1965) u.s. supreme court fox v. united states, 381 u.s. 436 (1965) 381 u.s. 436 fox v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of louisiana. no. 1032. decided june 1, 1965. affirmed. sidney w. provensal, jr., for appellant. solicitor general cox for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 381 u.s. 436, 437 motor convoy, inc., v. united states, 381 u.s. 436 (1965) 381 u.s. 436 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court motor convoy, inc., v. united states, 381 u.s. 436 (1965) 381 u.s. 436 motor convoy, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia. no. 987. decided june 1, 1965. 235 f. supp. 250, affirmed. paul m. daniell, robert e. born and martin sack for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and betty jo christian for the united states et al.; george s. dixon for national automobile transporters association; and nelson m. harris, jr., for dixie transport co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Full Judgment

FOX v. UNITED STATES - 381 U.S. 436 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court FOX v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965) 381 U.S. 436

FOX v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 1032.
Decided June 1, 1965.

Affirmed.

Sidney W. Provensal, Jr., for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 381 U.S. 436, 437

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101123"> 381 U.S. 436 </a> (1965) 381 U.S. 436 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965) 381 U.S. 436

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA. No. 987.
Decided June 1, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 250, affirmed.

Paul M. Daniell, Robert E. Born and Martin Sack for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; George S. Dixon for National Automobile Transporters Association; and Nelson M. Harris, Jr., for Dixie Transport Co., appellees.