Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fernandez Vs. Babare

Fernandez vs Babare

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-15-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101060

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
382 U.S. 107
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fernandez

Respondent

Babare

Excerpt

fernandez v. babare - 382 u.s. 107 (1965) u.s. supreme court fernandez v. babare, 382 u.s. 107 (1965) 382 u.s. 107 fernandez v. babare et ux. appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 610, misc. decided november 15, 1965. appeal dismissed. howard r. lonergan for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 382 u.s. 107, 108 michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit, 382 u.s. 107 (1965) 382 u.s. 107 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit, 382 u.s. 107 (1965) 382 u.s. 107 michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 497. decided november 15, 1965. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 498, detroit edison co. v. city of detroit, also on appeal from the same court. 374 mich. 543, 132 n. w. 2d 660, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied. thomas g. long, james m. smith and donald e. brown for appellant in no. 497. harvey a. fischer and richard ford for appellant in no. 498. john h. witherspoon for appellee. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Full Judgment

FERNANDEZ v. BABARE - 382 U.S. 107 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court FERNANDEZ v. BABARE, 382 U.S. 107 (1965) 382 U.S. 107

FERNANDEZ v. BABARE ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Howard R. Lonergan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 107, 108


MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, <a href="/101060"> 382 U.S. 107 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 107 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, 382 U.S. 107 (1965) 382 U.S. 107

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 497.
Decided November 15, 1965. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 498, Detroit Edison Co. v. City of Detroit, also on appeal from the same court.

374 Mich. 543, 132 N. W. 2d 660, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas G. Long, James M. Smith and Donald E. Brown for appellant in No. 497. Harvey A. Fischer and Richard Ford for appellant in No. 498.

John H. Witherspoon for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial