Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Burnham Van Service Vs. Pentecost

Burnham Van Service vs Pentecost

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-15-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101059

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
382 U.S. 106
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Burnham Van Service

Respondent

Pentecost

Excerpt

burnham van service v. pentecost - 382 u.s. 106 (1965) u.s. supreme court burnham van service v. pentecost, 382 u.s. 106 (1965) 382 u.s. 106 burnham van service et al. v. pentecost et al. appeal from the supreme court of tennessee. no. 494. decided november 15, 1965. appeal dismissed. j. g. lackey, jr., for appellants. george f. mccanless, attorney general of tennessee, and milton p. rice, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 382 u.s. 106, 107 alabama highway express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 106 (1965) 382 u.s. 106 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court alabama highway express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 106 (1965) 382 u.s. 106 alabama highway express, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of alabama. no. 447. decided november 15, 1965. 241 f. supp. 290, affirmed. james w. wrape and robert e. joyner for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and robert s. burk for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Full Judgment

BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST - 382 U.S. 106 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106

BURNHAM VAN SERVICE ET AL. v. PENTECOST ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 494.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 106, 107


ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101059"> 382 U.S. 106 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 106 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106

ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 447.
Decided November 15, 1965.

241 F. Supp. 290, affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial