Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hodges Vs. Buckeye Cellulose Corp.

Hodges vs Buckeye Cellulose Corp.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-22-1965
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101054

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
382 U.S. 160
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hodges

Respondent

Buckeye Cellulose Corp.

Excerpt

hodges v. buckeye cellulose corp. - 382 u.s. 160 (1965) u.s. supreme court hodges v. buckeye cellulose corp., 382 u.s. 160 (1965) 382 u.s. 160 hodges et al. v. buckeye cellulose corp. appeal from the district court of appeal of florida, first district. no. 548. decided november 22, 1965. 174 so.2d 565, appeal dismissed. george c. dayton and joe a. mcclain for appellants. richard w. barrett and j. lewis hall for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. page 382 u.s. 160, 161 reynolds metals co. v. washington, 382 u.s. 160 (1965) 382 u.s. 160 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court reynolds metals co. v. washington, 382 u.s. 160 (1965) 382 u.s. 160 reynolds metals co. v. washington et al. appeal from the supreme court of washington. no. 537. decided november 22, 1965. 65 wash. 2d 882, 400 p.2d 310, appeal dismissed. dewitt williams for appellant. john j. o'connell, attorney general of washington, and james a. furber and henry w. wager, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice stewart and mr. justice white are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Full Judgment

HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP. - 382 U.S. 160 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP., 382 U.S. 160 (1965) 382 U.S. 160

HODGES ET AL. v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT.
No. 548.
Decided November 22, 1965.

174 So.2d 565, appeal dismissed.

George C. Dayton and Joe A. McClain for appellants.

Richard W. Barrett and J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 382 U.S. 160, 161


REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="/101054"> 382 U.S. 160 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 160 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, 382 U.S. 160 (1965) 382 U.S. 160

REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 537.
Decided November 22, 1965.

65 Wash. 2d 882, 400 P.2d 310, appeal dismissed.

DeWitt Williams for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial