Katzenbach Vs. Mcclung

Katzenbach vs Mcclung

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101026

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101026
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1964
Case Number: 379 U.S. 802
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Katzenbach

Respondent

Mcclung

Excerpt

katzenbach v. mcclung - 379 u.s. 802 (1964) u.s. supreme court katzenbach v. mcclung , 379 u.s. 802 (1964) 379 u.s. 802 nicholas deb. katzenbach, as acting attorney general of the united states, et al., appellants, v. ollie mc clung, sr., et al. no. 543. supreme court of the united states october 5, 1964 solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general marshall, ralph s. spritzer, philip b. heymann, harold h. greene and gerald p. choppin, for appellants. robert mcd. smith and william g. somerville, for appellees. jack greenberg, constance baker motley, james m. nabrit iii and charles l. black, jr., for naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc., as amicus curiae. t. w. bruton, atty. gen. of north carolina, and ralph moody, deputy atty. gen., for the state of north carolina, as amicus curiae. the motion of naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. in this case probable jurisdiction is noted. the joint motion to expedite briefing and oral argument is granted and the case is set for oral argument on monday, october 5, 1964, immediately following no. 515.[ katzenbach v. mcclung 379 u.s. 802 (1964) ]

Full Judgment

KATZENBACH v. MCCLUNG - 379 U.S. 802 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court KATZENBACH v. MCCLUNG , 379 U.S. 802 (1964)

379 U.S. 802

Nicholas deB. KATZENBACH, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., appellants,
v.
Ollie Mc CLUNG, Sr., et al.
No. 543.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 5, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Philip B. Heymann, Harold H. Greene and Gerald P. Choppin, for appellants.

Robert McD. Smith and William G. Somerville, for appellees.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr., for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., as amicus curiae.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae.

The motion of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The joint motion to expedite briefing and oral argument is granted and the case is set for oral argument on Monday, October 5, 1964, immediately following No. 515.[ Katzenbach v. McClung 379 U.S. 802 (1964) ]

Same Parties Katzenbach vs Mcclung Same Subject Education

Education Solicitor general attorney general amicus curiae oral argument supreme court