Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hearne Vs. Smylie

Hearne vs Smylie

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101018

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
377 U.S. 563
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hearne

Respondent

Smylie

Excerpt

hearne v. smylie - 377 u.s. 563 (1964) u.s. supreme court hearne v. smylie , 377 u.s. 563 (1964) 377 u.s. 563 walter r. hearne et al. v. robert e. smylie, governor of idaho et al. no. 1075. supreme court of the united states june 22, 1964 herman j. mcdevitt, for appellants. allan g. shepard, atty. gen. of idaho, and m. allyn dingel, jr., asst. atty. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the judgment below is reversed. baker v. carr, 369 u.s. 186 ; reynolds v. sims, 377 u.s. 533 . the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in reynolds v. sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with reynolds. mr. justice clark would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in lucas v. forty-fourth general assembly of colorado, 377 u.s. 713, 741 , 1476. mr. justice stewart would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in his dissenting opinion in lucas v. forty-fourth general assembly of colorado, 377 u.s. 713, 744 , 1477. mr. justice harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in reynolds v. sims, 377 u.s. 533, 589 , 1395.[ hearne v. smylie 377 u.s. 563 (1964) ]

Full Judgment

HEARNE v. SMYLIE - 377 U.S. 563 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court HEARNE v. SMYLIE , 377 U.S. 563 (1964)

377 U.S. 563

Walter R. HEARNE et al.
v.
Robert E. SMYLIE, Governor of Idaho et al.
No. 1075.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 22, 1964

Herman J. McDevitt, for appellants.

Allan G. Shepard, Atty. Gen. of Idaho, and M. Allyn Dingel, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is reversed. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 ; Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 . The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.

Mr. Justice CLARK would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 741 , 1476.

Mr. Justice STEWART would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 744 , 1477.

Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 589 , 1395.[ Hearne v. Smylie 377 U.S. 563 (1964) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial