Cox Vs. Kansas

Cox vs Kansas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-17-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100990

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100990
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Feb-17-1964
Case Number: 376 U.S. 191
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cox

Respondent

Kansas

Excerpt

cox v. kansas - 376 u.s. 191 (1964) u.s. supreme court cox v. kansas, 376 u.s. 191 (1964) 376 u.s. 191 cox v. kansas. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of kansas. no. 453, misc. decided february 17, 1964. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 191 kan. 326, 456, 380 p.2d 316, 381 p.2d 704. petitioner pro se. william m. ferguson, attorney general of kansas, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of kansas for further consideration in light of douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 , and daegele v. kansas, 375 u.s. 1 . page 376 u.s. 191, 192

Full Judgment

COX v. KANSAS - 376 U.S. 191 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court COX v. KANSAS, 376 U.S. 191 (1964) 376 U.S. 191

COX v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 453, Misc.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 191 Kan. 326, 456, 380 P.2d 316, 381 P.2d 704.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , and Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1 .

Page 376 U.S. 191, 192

Same Parties Cox vs Kansas Same Subject Miscellaneous