Daegeke Vs. Kansas

Daegeke vs Kansas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100475

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100475
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-14-1963
Case Number: 375 U.S. 1
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daegeke

Respondent

Kansas

Excerpt

daegeke v. kansas - 375 u.s. 1 (1963) u.s. supreme court daegeke v. kansas, 375 u.s. 1 (1963) 375 u.s. 1 daegeke v. kansas. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of kansas. no. 72, misc. decided october 14, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 190 kan. 613, 376 p.2d 807. petitioner pro se. william m. ferguson, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of kansas for further consideration in light of douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . for reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in no. 16, misc., pickelsimer v. wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, mr. justice harlan would set this case for argument of the question whether douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 , should be applied retroactively. page 375 u.s. 1, 2

Full Judgment

DAEGEKE v. KANSAS - 375 U.S. 1 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DAEGEKE v. KANSAS, 375 U.S. 1 (1963) 375 U.S. 1

DAEGEKE v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 72, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 190 Kan. 613, 376 P.2d 807.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , should be applied retroactively.

Page 375 U.S. 1, 2

Same Parties Daegeke vs Kansas Same Subject Land Acquisition