Shuttlesworth Vs. Birmingham

Shuttlesworth vs Birmingham

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-09-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100965
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-09-1964
Case Number: 376 U.S. 339
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shuttlesworth

Respondent

Birmingham

Excerpt

shuttlesworth v. birmingham - 376 u.s. 339 (1964) u.s. supreme court shuttlesworth v. birmingham, 376 u.s. 339 (1964) 376 u.s. 339 shuttlesworth v. city of birmingham. certiorari to the court of appeals of alabama. no. 168. argued february 27, 1964. decided march 9, 1964. 42 ala. app. 1, 149 so.2d 921, reversed. jack greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief were james m. nabrit iii, peter a. hall and orzell billingsley, jr. j. m. breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. per curiam. the judgment of the court of appeals of alabama is reversed. cole v. arkansas, 333 u.s. 196 ; williams v. georgia, 349 u.s. 375 . mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 376 u.s. 339, 340

Full Judgment

SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM - 376 U.S. 339 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964) 376 U.S. 339

SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.

42 Ala. App. 1, 149 So.2d 921, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.

J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 ; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375 .

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 376 U.S. 339, 340

Same Parties Shuttlesworth vs Birmingham Same Subject MRTP