Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.D.Thomas Vs. State of Kerala

K.D.Thomas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009593

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.D.Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....court on the same day delivered the following: tss w.p.(c) no.30882/2012 appendix petitioner(s) exhibits p1 : copy of the registered title deed no.638/1964 of sro, chalakkara, dtd.29.8.1964. p2 : copy of the application submitted by the petitioner for survey, measurement and identification of the property dtd.30.3.2012. p3 : copy of the appeal filed by the petitioner to the re-survey superintendent dtd.24.8.2012 as c2-3472/12 under survey and boundaries act. p4 : copy of the communication dtd.20.10.2012 in c2-3472/12 issued to the petitioner by the 3rd respondent. p5 : copy of the application submitted by the petitioner on 14.8.2012 for accepting the basic tax. respondents' exhibits nil //true copy// p.s. to judge tss t.r.ramachandran nair, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c).no. 30882 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment the petitioner is seeking for a direction to the sixth respondent to take a decision on the appeal, ext.p3.2. certain items of properties are owned by the petitioner as described in para 1 of the writ petition. the petitioner has filed an appeal as per ext.p3 in respect of a dispute regarding re-survey. the same was filed before the third respondent. it is submitted that ext.p3 was forwarded to the sixth respondent as per ext.p5. the petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the appeal.3. there will be a direction to the sixth respondent to take appropriate steps to dispose of ext.p3 after hearing the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. the writ petition is disposed of as above. no costs. (t.r.ramachandran nair, judge) kav/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30882 of 2012 (I) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.D.THOMAS, AGED 7 YEARS S/O. LATE DEVASSY, KALLUR HOUSE, MEENACHIL TALUK KONDOOR VILLAGE AND P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.I.JOSEPH S/O. LATE ITTIYVIRA, AGED 6 YEARS,KALLUR HOUSE VENGALLUR VILLAGE, VENGANALLUR P.O. THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT”

623. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. LAND AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 003.

3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY (RANGE), THRISSUR-680 001.

4. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS (RE-SURVEY) OFFICE OF RE-SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, COLLECTORATE THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 003.

5. TAHSILDAR , TALAPPILLY TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR-680 582.

6. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR ,TALAPPILLY TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, WADAKKANCHERY P.O.,THRISSUR-680 582.

7. VILLAGE OFFICER,VENGANALLUR VILLAGE, VENGANALLUR P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 611. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.30882/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF THE REGISTERED TITLE DEED NO.638/1964 OF SRO, CHALAKKARA, DTD.29.8.1964. P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR SURVEY, MEASUREMENT AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY DTD.30.3.2012. P3 : COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RE-SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT DTD.24.8.2012 AS C2-3472/12 UNDER SURVEY AND BOUNDARIES ACT. P4 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD.20.10.2012 IN C2-3472/12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 14.8.2012 FOR ACCEPTING THE BASIC TAX. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 30882 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2012 JUDGMENT The petitioner is seeking for a direction to the sixth respondent to take a decision on the appeal, Ext.P3.

2. Certain items of properties are owned by the petitioner as described in para 1 of the writ petition. The petitioner has filed an appeal as per Ext.P3 in respect of a dispute regarding re-survey. The same was filed before the third respondent. It is submitted that Ext.P3 was forwarded to the sixth respondent as per Ext.P5. The petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the appeal.

3. There will be a direction to the sixth respondent to take appropriate steps to dispose of Ext.P3 after hearing the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) kav/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial