Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rafeeq Vs. State of Kerala

Rafeeq vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 20, 2012
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1009547

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Commercial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Commercial

Key legal issue
Commercial

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rafeeq

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....exhibit p6. a true copy of the postal receipt evidencing the sending of exhibit p5. respondents' exhibits: nil true copy p.a.to judge dsn t.r.ramachandran nair, j.-------------------------------------------------- w.p.(c)nos.30754, 30787 & 30862 of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of december, 2012 judgment these writ petitions have been filed by the respective petitioners seeking for a direction to the district collector to pass appropriate orders with regard to the final adjudication proceedings. the vehicles have been seized alleging violation of the provisions under the kerala protection of river banks and regulation of removal of sand act. the judicial first class magistrate court, vaikom has passed an order as per exhibit p4 directing interim release of the vehicles. it is pointed out that the petitioners are unable to comply with the conditions therein. the same is a common order in respect of many cases.2. in a connected writ petition, this court has already directed final adjudication to be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representations of the petitioners and complete the proceedings within a period of six weeks from w.p.(c)no.30754, 30787 & 30862/12 -2- the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. the writ petitions are disposed of as above. sd/-(t.r.ramachandran nair) judge. dsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 29TH AGRAHAYANA 193 WP(C).No. 30754 of 2012 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- RAFEEQ, AGED 4 YEARS S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN MANGATTIL HOUSE, CHEMBU.P.O. CHEMBU VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.ELDHO SRI.JIJO THOMAS SRI.SURAJ.S SRI.ANEESH JAMES RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM-686001.

3. THE STATION HOSUE OFFICER VAIKOM POLICE STATION, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM-686141. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SAREENA GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-12-2012, ALONG WITH W.P.(C)No.30787/12 & W.P.(C)No.30862/12, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.30754/12 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1099 REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS. EXHIBIT P2. A TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR PREPARED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3. A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JFCM 1 VAIKOM FOR THE RELEASE OF THE VEHICLE. EXHIBIT P4. A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER ISSUED BY THE JFCM 1 IN CRIME NO. 1009/2012 OF VAIKOM POLICE STATION. EXHIBIT P5. A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 22 11.2012(WITHOUT ANNEXURES). EXHIBIT P6. A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE SENDING OF EXHIBIT P5. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)Nos.30754, 30787 & 30862 Of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2012 JUDGMENT These Writ Petitions have been filed by the respective petitioners seeking for a direction to the District Collector to pass appropriate orders with regard to the final adjudication proceedings. The vehicles have been seized alleging violation of the provisions under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act. The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vaikom has passed an order as per Exhibit P4 directing interim release of the vehicles. It is pointed out that the petitioners are unable to comply with the conditions therein. The same is a common order in respect of many cases.

2. In a connected Writ Petition, this Court has already directed final adjudication to be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representations of the petitioners and complete the proceedings within a period of six weeks from W.P.(C)No.30754, 30787 & 30862/12 -2- the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE. dsn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial