Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kirk Vs. Boehm

Kirk vs Boehm

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-23-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100953

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 512
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kirk

Respondent

Boehm

Excerpt

kirk v. boehm - 376 u.s. 512 (1964) u.s. supreme court kirk v. boehm, 376 u.s. 512 (1964) 376 u.s. 512 kirk v. boehm, superintendent, department of public instruction, pennsylvania, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of pennsylvania. no. 753. decided march 23, 1964. 216 f. supp. 952, affirmed. appellant pro se. john d. killian iii, deputy attorney general of pennsylvania, and lewis b. beatty, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. cepero v. president of the united states, 376 u.s. 512 (1964) 376 u.s. 512 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court cepero v. president of the united states, 376 u.s. 512 (1964) 376 u.s. 512 cepero v. president of the united states et al. appeals from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. nos. 671, misc., and 843, misc. decided march 23, 1964. appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction. per curiam. the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. the chief justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 376 u.s. 512, 513

Full Judgment

KIRK v. BOEHM - 376 U.S. 512 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512

KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 753.
Decided March 23, 1964.

216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.

Appellant pro se.

John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, <a href="/100953"> 376 U.S. 512 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 512 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 376 U.S. 512, 513



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial