Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carter Vs. Florida

Carter vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-30-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100941

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 648
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carter

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

carter v. florida - 376 u.s. 648 (1964) u.s. supreme court carter v. florida, 376 u.s. 648 (1964) 376 u.s. 648 carter v. florida. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 817. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 155 so.2d 787. hal s. ives for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 376 u.s. 648, 649 suburban telephone v. mountain states telephone, tele., 376 u.s. 648 (1964) 376 u.s. 648 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court suburban telephone v. mountain states telephone, tele., 376 u.s. 648 (1964) 376 u.s. 648 suburban telephone co. v. mountain states telephone & telegraph co. et al. appeal from the supreme court of new mexico. no. 800. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 72 n. m. 411, 384 p.2d 684. j. kenneth baird and robert a. sprecher for appellant. j. h. shepherd for mountain states telephone & telegraph co., and julian s. ertz for tadlock et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Full Judgment

CARTER v. FLORIDA - 376 U.S. 648 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court CARTER v. FLORIDA, 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648

CARTER v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 817.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 155 So.2d 787.

Hal S. Ives for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 376 U.S. 648, 649


SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., <a href="/100941"> 376 U.S. 648 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 648 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648

SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 800.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 72 N. M. 411, 384 P.2d 684.

J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant.

J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. Ertz for Tadlock et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial