Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Green Vs. Virginia

Green vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100812

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
378 U.S. 550
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Green

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

green v. virginia - 378 u.s. 550 (1964) u.s. supreme court green v. virginia, 378 u.s. 550 (1964) 378 u.s. 550 green et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 761. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii and roland d. ealey for petitioners. reno s. harp iii, assistant attorney general of virginia, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for consideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373 u.s. 244 , and robinson v. florida, ante, p. 153. mr. justice douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in bell v. maryland, ante, p. 242. page 378 u.s. 550, 551

Full Judgment

GREEN v. VIRGINIA - 378 U.S. 550 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court GREEN v. VIRGINIA, 378 U.S. 550 (1964) 378 U.S. 550

GREEN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 761.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Roland D. Ealey for petitioners.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 , and Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

Page 378 U.S. 550, 551



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial