Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lind Vs. Minnesota

Lind vs Minnesota

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-12-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100787

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
379 U.S. 9
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lind

Respondent

Minnesota

Excerpt

lind v. minnesota - 379 u.s. 9 (1964) u.s. supreme court lind v. minnesota, 379 u.s. 9 (1964) 379 u.s. 9 lind v. minnesota et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of minnesota. no. 163, misc. decided october 12, 1964. appeal dismissed. appellant pro se. walter f. mondale, attorney general of minnesota, and charles e. houston and linus j. hammond, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. page 379 u.s. 9, 10 jurus v. columbus bar association, 379 u.s. 9 (1964) 379 u.s. 9 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court jurus v. columbus bar association, 379 u.s. 9 (1964) 379 u.s. 9 jurus v. columbus bar association. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 260. decided october 12, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 175 ohio st. 449, 196 n. e. 2d 94. george e. tyack for appellant. s. noel melvin for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Full Judgment

LIND v. MINNESOTA - 379 U.S. 9 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court LIND v. MINNESOTA, 379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9

LIND v. MINNESOTA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 163, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston and Linus J. Hammond, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 379 U.S. 9, 10


JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, <a href="/100787"> 379 U.S. 9 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 9 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, 379 U.S. 9 (1964) 379 U.S. 9

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 260.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 175 Ohio St. 449, 196 N. E. 2d 94.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

S. Noel Melvin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial