Tancil Vs. Woolls

Tancil vs Woolls

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-26-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100773

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100773
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-26-1964
Case Number: 379 U.S. 19
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tancil

Respondent

Woolls

Excerpt

tancil v. woolls - 379 u.s. 19 (1964) u.s. supreme court tancil v. woolls, 379 u.s. 19 (1964) 379 u.s. 19 tancil et al. v. woolls et al., judges. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of virginia. no. 386. decided october 26, 1964. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 412, virginia board of elections et al. v. hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court. 230 f. supp. 156, affirmed. allison w. brown, jr., for appellants in no. 386 and for appellees in no. 412. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, william j. hassan and ralph g. louk for appellants in no. 412. per curiam. the motion to affirm in no. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed. mr. justice harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. mr. justice brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in no. 386. page 379 u.s. 19, 20

Full Judgment

TANCIL v. WOOLLS - 379 U.S. 19 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964) 379 U.S. 19

TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.

230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Page 379 U.S. 19, 20

Same Parties Tancil vs Woolls Same Subject Criminal