Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hooper Vs. Duncan

Hooper vs Duncan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-09-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100770

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
379 U.S. 27
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hooper

Respondent

Duncan

Excerpt

hooper v. duncan - 379 u.s. 27 (1964) u.s. supreme court hooper v. duncan, 379 u.s. 27 (1964) 379 u.s. 27 hooper v. duncan, superintendent, department of liquor licenses and control of arizona, et al. appeal from the supreme court of arizona. no. 393. decided november 9, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 95 ariz. 305, 389 p.2d 706. alfred c. marquez for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. albaugh v. tawes, 379 u.s. 27 (1964) 379 u.s. 27 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court albaugh v. tawes, 379 u.s. 27 (1964) 379 u.s. 27 albaugh v. tawes, governor of maryland, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of maryland. no. 481. decided november 9, 1964. 233 f. supp. 576, affirmed. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. page 379 u.s. 27, 28

Full Judgment

HOOPER v. DUNCAN - 379 U.S. 27 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court HOOPER v. DUNCAN, 379 U.S. 27 (1964) 379 U.S. 27

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
OF ARIZONA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. No. 393.
Decided November 9, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.

Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ALBAUGH v. TAWES, <a href="/100770"> 379 U.S. 27 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 27 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964) 379 U.S. 27

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.

233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 379 U.S. 27, 28



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial