Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cross Vs. Bruning

Cross vs Bruning

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-07-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
379 U.S. 202
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cross

Respondent

Bruning

Excerpt

cross v. bruning - 379 u.s. 202 (1964) u.s. supreme court cross v. bruning, 379 u.s. 202 (1964) 379 u.s. 202 cross et al. v. bruning et al. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 436, misc. decided december 7, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. the chief justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 379 u.s. 202, 203

Full Judgment

CROSS v. BRUNING - 379 U.S. 202 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court CROSS v. BRUNING, 379 U.S. 202 (1964) 379 U.S. 202

CROSS ET AL. v. BRUNING ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 436, Misc.
Decided December 7, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 379 U.S. 202, 203



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial