Walker Vs. United States

Walker vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-18-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100684

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100684
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-18-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 526
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Walker

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

walker v. united states - 372 u.s. 526 (1963) u.s. supreme court walker v. united states, 372 u.s. 526 (1963) 372 u.s. 526 walker v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 657. decided march 18, 1963. 208 f. supp. 388, affirmed. henry w. moursund, maynard f. robinson and r. dean moorhead for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, irwin a. seibel and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al., and george nokes, roland rice, carl wright johnson and nat l. hardy for central freight lines inc. et al., appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 372 u.s. 526, 527

Full Judgment

WALKER v. UNITED STATES - 372 U.S. 526 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court WALKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 526 (1963) 372 U.S. 526

WALKER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 657.
Decided March 18, 1963.

208 F. Supp. 388, affirmed.

Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 372 U.S. 526, 527

Same Parties Walker vs United States Same Subject MRTP