Holmes Vs. California

Holmes vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-15-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100658

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100658
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-15-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 710
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Holmes

Respondent

California

Excerpt

holmes v. california - 372 u.s. 710 (1963) u.s. supreme court holmes v. california, 372 u.s. 710 (1963) 372 u.s. 710 holmes v. california et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 70, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 197 cal. app. 2d 699, 17 cal. rptr. 599. petitioner pro se. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, and william e. james, assistant attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . mr. justice clark and mr. justice harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in douglas v. california, 372 u.s., at 358, 360. mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 372 u.s. 710, 711

Full Judgment

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA - 372 U.S. 710 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 710 (1963) 372 U.S. 710

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 197 Cal. App. 2d 699, 17 Cal. Rptr. 599.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 372 U.S. 710, 711

Same Parties Holmes vs California Same Subject Land Acquisition