Lindner Vs. Nash

Lindner vs Nash

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-22-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100637

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100637
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-22-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 777
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lindner

Respondent

Nash

Excerpt

lindner v. nash - 372 u.s. 777 (1963) u.s. supreme court lindner v. nash, 372 u.s. 777 (1963) 372 u.s. 777 lindner v. nash, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of missouri. no. 61, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas f. eagleton, attorney general of missouri, and howard l. mcfadden, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 777, 778

Full Judgment

LINDNER v. NASH - 372 U.S. 777 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court LINDNER v. NASH, 372 U.S. 777 (1963) 372 U.S. 777

LINDNER v. NASH, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 61, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 777, 778

Same Parties Lindner vs Nash Same Subject Contract