Patterson Vs. Warden

Patterson vs Warden

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-22-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100636
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-22-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 776
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Patterson

Respondent

Warden

Excerpt

patterson v. warden - 372 u.s. 776 (1963) u.s. supreme court patterson v. warden, 372 u.s. 776 (1963) 372 u.s. 776 patterson v. warden, maryland penitentiary. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of maryland. no. 14, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 227 md. 194, 175 a. 2d 746. petitioner pro se. thomas b. finan, attorney general of maryland, and gerard w. wittstadt, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 776, 777

Full Judgment

PATTERSON v. WARDEN - 372 U.S. 776 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court PATTERSON v. WARDEN, 372 U.S. 776 (1963) 372 U.S. 776

PATTERSON v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 14, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 227 Md. 194, 175 A. 2d 746.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Gerard W. Wittstadt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 776, 777

Same Parties Patterson vs Warden Same Subject Contract