Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Flora Construction Co. Vs. Grand Junction Steel Fab.

Flora Construction Co. vs Grand Junction Steel Fab.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-13-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
373 U.S. 240
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Flora Construction Co.

Respondent

Grand Junction Steel Fab.

Excerpt

flora construction co. v. grand junction steel fab. - 373 u.s. 240 (1963) u.s. supreme court flora construction co. v. grand junction steel fab., 373 u.s. 240 (1963) 373 u.s. 240 flora construction co. v. grand junction steel fabricating co. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of nevada. no. 949. decided may 13, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. per curiam. the motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 373 u.s. 240, 241 shott v. ohio, 373 u.s. 240 (1963) 373 u.s. 240 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court shott v. ohio, 373 u.s. 240 (1963) 373 u.s. 240 shott v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 877. decided may 13, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 173 ohio st. 542, 184 n. e. 2d 213. thurman arnold, james g. andrews, jr. and john a. lloyd, jr. for appellant. harry c. schoettmer for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Full Judgment

FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB. - 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240

FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 240, 241


SHOTT v. OHIO, <a href="/100610"> 373 U.S. 240 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 240 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240

SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E. 2d 213.

Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.

Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial