Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gober Vs. City of Birmingham

Gober vs City of Birmingham

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-20-1963
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100595

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
373 U.S. 374
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gober

Respondent

City of Birmingham

Excerpt

gober v. city of birmingham - 373 u.s. 374 (1963) u.s. supreme court gober v. city of birmingham, 373 u.s. 374 (1963) 373 u.s. 374 gober et al. v. city of birmingham. certiorari to the court of appeals of alabama. no. 66. argued november 6-7, 1962. decided may 20, 1963. in birmingham, ala., which has an ordinance requiring racial segregation in public eating places, ten negro students were convicted of criminal trespass on private property for sitting at white lunch counters in department stores and failing to leave when requested to do so. held: the convictions are reversed. peterson v. city of greenville, ante, p. 244. 41 ala. app. 313, 133 so.2d 697, reversed. constance baker motley argued the cause for petitioners. with her on the brief were jack greenberg, arthur d. shores, peter a. hall, orzell billingsley, jr., oscar w. adams, jr., leroy clark, william t. coleman, jr., william r. ming, jr., james m. nabrit iii and louis h. pollak. watts e. davis and j. m. breckenridge argued the cause for respondent. with mr. davis on the brief was earl mcbee. solicitor general cox, by special leave of court, argued the cause for the united states, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. with him on the brief were assistant attorney general marshall, ralph s. spritzer, louis f. claiborne, harold h. greene, howard a. glickstein and richard k. berg. per curiam. the judgments are reversed. peterson v. city of greenville, ante, p. 244. [for opinion of mr. justice harlan, see ante, p. 248.] page 373 u.s. 374, 375

Full Judgment

GOBER v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM - 373 U.S. 374 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court GOBER v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 373 U.S. 374 (1963) 373 U.S. 374

GOBER ET AL. v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 66.
Argued November 6-7, 1962.
Decided May 20, 1963.

In Birmingham, Ala., which has an ordinance requiring racial segregation in public eating places, ten Negro students were convicted of criminal trespass on private property for sitting at white lunch counters in department stores and failing to leave when requested to do so. Held: The convictions are reversed. Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 244.

41 Ala. App. 313, 133 So.2d 697, reversed.

Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Leroy Clark, William T. Coleman, Jr., William R. Ming, Jr., James M. Nabrit III and Louis H. Pollak.

Watts E. Davis and J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause for respondent. With Mr. Davis on the brief was Earl McBee.

Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene, Howard A. Glickstein and Richard K. Berg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 244.

[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see ante, p. 248.]

Page 373 U.S. 374, 375



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial