Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cepero Vs. United States

Cepero vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-27-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100585

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
373 U.S. 544
Subject
Intellectual Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Intellectual Property

Key legal issue
Intellectual Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cepero

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

cepero v. united states - 373 u.s. 544 (1963) u.s. supreme court cepero v. united states, 373 u.s. 544 (1963) 373 u.s. 544 cepero v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 1227, misc. decided may 27, 1963. appeal dismissed. reported below: ___ f. supp. ___. appellant pro se. solicitor general cox for the united states. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. page 373 u.s. 544, 545 smith v. kansas, 373 u.s. 544 (1963) 373 u.s. 544 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court smith v. kansas, 373 u.s. 544 (1963) 373 u.s. 544 smith v. kansas et al. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 966, misc. decided may 27, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 188 kan. 473, 363 p.2d 541. appellant pro se. william m. ferguson, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth and park mcgee, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Full Judgment

CEPERO v. UNITED STATES - 373 U.S. 544 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544

CEPERO v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1227, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 373 U.S. 544, 545


SMITH v. KANSAS, <a href="/100585"> 373 U.S. 544 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 544 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. KANSAS, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544

SMITH v. KANSAS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 966, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 188 Kan. 473, 363 P.2d 541.

Appellant pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial