Randolph Vs. Virginia

Randolph vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100544

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100544
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-10-1963
Case Number: 374 U.S. 97
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Randolph

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

randolph v. virginia - 374 u.s. 97 (1963) u.s. supreme court randolph v. virginia, 374 u.s. 97 (1963) 374 u.s. 97 randolph et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 20. decided june 10, 1963. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 202 va. 661, 119 s. e. 2d 817. martin a. martin, clarence w. newsome, jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii, and charles l. black, jr. for petitioners. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, and r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for reconsideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373 u.s. 244 . mr. justice harlan concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in peterson v. city of greenville and avent v. north carolina, 373 u.s., at 248. page 374 u.s. 97, 98

Full Judgment

RANDOLPH v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 97 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court RANDOLPH v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 97 (1963) 374 U.S. 97

RANDOLPH ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 20.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 202 Va. 661, 119 S. E. 2d 817.

Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Charles L. Black, Jr. for petitioners.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 97, 98

Same Parties Randolph vs Virginia Same Subject Land Acquisition