Daniels Vs. Virginia

Daniels vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100524
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1963
Case Number: 374 U.S. 500
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Daniels

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

daniels v. virginia - 374 u.s. 500 (1963) u.s. supreme court daniels v. virginia, 374 u.s. 500 (1963) 374 u.s. 500 daniels et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 485, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. theodore j. st. antoine for petitioners. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373 u.s. 244 . mr. justice harlan concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in peterson v. city of greenville and avent v. north carolina, 373 u.s., at 248. page 374 u.s. 500, 501

Full Judgment

DANIELS v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 500 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DANIELS v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 500 (1963) 374 U.S. 500

DANIELS ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 485, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Theodore J. St. Antoine for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 500, 501

Same Parties Daniels vs Virginia Same Subject Right to Information