Cooper Vs. Alabama

Cooper vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100495

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100495
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-14-1963
Case Number: 375 U.S. 23
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cooper

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

cooper v. alabama - 375 u.s. 23 (1963) u.s. supreme court cooper v. alabama, 375 u.s. 23 (1963) 375 u.s. 23 cooper v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 32, misc. decided october 14, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 274 ala. 471, 149 so.2d 834. petitioner pro se. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and david w. clark, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of alabama for further consideration in light of lane v. brown, 372 u.s. 477 . page 375 u.s. 23, 24

Full Judgment

COOPER v. ALABAMA - 375 U.S. 23 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court COOPER v. ALABAMA, 375 U.S. 23 (1963) 375 U.S. 23

COOPER v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 32, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 274 Ala. 471, 149 So.2d 834.

Petitioner pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 .

Page 375 U.S. 23, 24

Same Parties Cooper vs Alabama Same Subject Contract