Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cade Vs. Louisiana

Cade vs Louisiana

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-21-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100467

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 44
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cade

Respondent

Louisiana

Excerpt

cade v. louisiana - 375 u.s. 44 (1963) u.s. supreme court cade v. louisiana, 375 u.s. 44 (1963) 375 u.s. 44 cade v. louisiana. appeal from the supreme court of louisiana. no. 340. decided october 21, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. james sharp, jr. for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 375 u.s. 44, 45 fields v. south carolina, 375 u.s. 44 (1963) 375 u.s. 44 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court fields v. south carolina, 375 u.s. 44 (1963) 375 u.s. 44 fields et al. v. south carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of south carolina. no. 335. decided october 21, 1963. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. jack greenberg, constance baker motley, matthew j. perry and lincoln c. jenkins, jr. for petitioners. daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, everett n. brandon, assistant attorney general, and julian s. wolfe for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is reversed. edwards v. south carolina, 372 u.s. 229 .

Full Judgment

CADE v. LOUISIANA - 375 U.S. 44 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CADE v. LOUISIANA, 375 U.S. 44 (1963) 375 U.S. 44

CADE v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 340.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James Sharp, Jr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 375 U.S. 44, 45


FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA, <a href="/100467"> 375 U.S. 44 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 44 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 375 U.S. 44 (1963) 375 U.S. 44

FIELDS ET AL. v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 335.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, and Julian S. Wolfe for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 .



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial