Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dunlap Vs. Ohio

Dunlap vs Ohio

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-21-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 42
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dunlap

Respondent

Ohio

Excerpt

dunlap v. ohio - 375 u.s. 42 (1963) u.s. supreme court dunlap v. ohio, 375 u.s. 42 (1963) 375 u.s. 42 dunlap et al. v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 288. decided october 21, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. melvin schaengold for appellants. william s. mathews and calvin w. prem for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. stover v. new york, 375 u.s. 42 (1963) 375 u.s. 42 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court stover v. new york, 375 u.s. 42 (1963) 375 u.s. 42 stover et vir v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 313. decided october 21, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 12 n. y. 2d 462, 191 n. e. 2d 272. morris l. ernst for appellants. anthony t. antinozzi for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 375 u.s. 42, 43

Full Judgment

DUNLAP v. OHIO - 375 U.S. 42 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DUNLAP v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 42 (1963) 375 U.S. 42

DUNLAP ET AL. v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 288.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Melvin Schaengold for appellants.

William S. Mathews and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


STOVER v. NEW YORK, <a href="/100465"> 375 U.S. 42 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 42 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court STOVER v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 42 (1963) 375 U.S. 42

STOVER ET VIR v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 313.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 N. Y. 2d 462, 191 N. E. 2d 272.

Morris L. Ernst for appellants.

Anthony T. Antinozzi for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 42, 43



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial