Simcox Vs. Madigan

Simcox vs Madigan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-05-1961

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100072

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100072
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-05-1961
Case Number: 366 U.S. 765
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Simcox

Respondent

Madigan

Excerpt

simcox v. madigan - 366 u.s. 765 (1961) u.s. supreme court simcox v. madigan, 366 u.s. 765 (1961) 366 u.s. 765 simcox v. madigan, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 699, misc. decided june 5, 1961. certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general doar, harold h. greene and david rubin for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the solicitor general. ellis v. united states, 356 u.s. 674 . page 366 u.s. 765, 1

Full Judgment

SIMCOX v. MADIGAN - 366 U.S. 765 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court SIMCOX v. MADIGAN, 366 U.S. 765 (1961) 366 U.S. 765

SIMCOX v. MADIGAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 699, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the Solicitor General. Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 .

Page 366 U.S. 765, 1

Same Parties Simcox vs Madigan Same Subject Land Acquisition