Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Eagle Vs. Bennett

Eagle vs Bennett

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-30-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100356

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
369 U.S. 525
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Eagle

Respondent

Bennett

Excerpt

eagle v. bennett - 369 u.s. 525 (1962) u.s. supreme court eagle v. bennett, 369 u.s. 525 (1962) 369 u.s. 525 eagle et al. v. bennett, warden. appeal from the district court of lee county, iowa. no. 687, misc. decided april 30, 1962. appeal dismissed; certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 525, 526 friedberg v. silberglitt, 369 u.s. 525 (1962) 369 u.s. 525 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court friedberg v. silberglitt, 369 u.s. 525 (1962) 369 u.s. 525 friedberg v. silberglitt, warden. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 777. decided april 30, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. gilbert s. rosenthal for appellant. frank s. hogan and h. richard uviller for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Full Judgment

EAGLE v. BENNETT - 369 U.S. 525 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court EAGLE v. BENNETT, 369 U.S. 525 (1962) 369 U.S. 525

EAGLE ET AL. v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, IOWA.
No. 687, Misc.
Decided April 30, 1962.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 525, 526


FRIEDBERG v. SILBERGLITT, <a href="/100356"> 369 U.S. 525 </a> (1962) 369 U.S. 525 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDBERG v. SILBERGLITT, 369 U.S. 525 (1962) 369 U.S. 525

FRIEDBERG v. SILBERGLITT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 777.
Decided April 30, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial