Barton Vs. District Court

Barton vs District Court

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-08-1962

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100269

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100269
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-08-1962
Case Number: 371 U.S. 15
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Barton

Respondent

District Court

Excerpt

barton v. district court - 371 u.s. 15 (1962) u.s. supreme court barton v. district court, 371 u.s. 15 (1962) 371 u.s. 15 barton v. district court of iowa in and for union county. appeal from the supreme court of iowa. no. 31, misc. decided october 8, 1962. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. evan hultman, attorney general of iowa, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 371 u.s. 15, 16

Full Judgment

BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT - 371 U.S. 15 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT, 371 U.S. 15 (1962) 371 U.S. 15

BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT OF IOWA IN AND FOR UNION COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 31, Misc.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 15, 16

Same Parties Barton vs District Court Same Subject Contract