Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bel Oil Corp. Vs. Cocreham

Bel Oil Corp. vs Cocreham

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-08-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100256

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
371 U.S. 2
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bel Oil Corp.

Respondent

Cocreham

Excerpt

bel oil corp. v. cocreham - 371 u.s. 2 (1962) u.s. supreme court bel oil corp. v. cocreham, 371 u.s. 2 (1962) 371 u.s. 2 bel oil corp. v. cocreham, collector of revenue of louisiana. appeal from the supreme court of louisiana. no. 123. decided october 8, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 242 la. 498, 137 so.2d 308. howard b. gist for appellant. chapman l. sanford for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. united states v. brown, 371 u.s. 2 (1962) 371 u.s. 2 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court united states v. brown, 371 u.s. 2 (1962) 371 u.s. 2 united states v. brown et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 128. decided october 8, 1962. 204 f. supp. 407, reversed. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger and lionel kestenbaum for the united states. per curiam. the judgment is reversed. united states v. wise, 370 u.s. 405 . mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 371 u.s. 2, 3

Full Judgment

BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM - 371 U.S. 2 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM, 371 U.S. 2 (1962) 371 U.S. 2

BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 123.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 498, 137 So.2d 308.

Howard B. Gist for appellant.

Chapman L. Sanford for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


UNITED STATES v. BROWN, <a href="/100256"> 371 U.S. 2 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 2 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 2 (1962) 371 U.S. 2

UNITED STATES v. BROWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 8, 1962.

204 F. Supp. 407, reversed.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405 .

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 2, 3



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial