Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ableman Vs. City of Cedar Rapids

Ableman vs City of Cedar Rapids

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-09-1961
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100026

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
368 U.S. 3
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ableman

Respondent

City of Cedar Rapids

Excerpt

ableman v. city of cedar rapids - 368 u.s. 3 (1961) u.s. supreme court ableman v. city of cedar rapids, 368 u.s. 3 (1961) 368 u.s. 3 ableman et al. v. city of cedar rapids. appeal from the supreme court of iowa. no. 246. decided october 9, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 252 iowa 948, 108 n. w. 2d 253. ernest f. pence and roy a. golden for appellants. c. w. garberson and william m. dallas for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 368 u.s. 3, 4 security-1st nat. bk., los angeles v. franchise tax bd., 368 u.s. 3 (1961) 368 u.s. 3 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court security-1st nat. bk., los angeles v. franchise tax bd., 368 u.s. 3 (1961) 368 u.s. 3 security-first national bank of los angeles et al. v. franchise tax board of california. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 122. decided october 9, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 55 cal. 2d 407, 359 p.2d 625. pierce works, warren m. christopher, hugo a. steinmeyer, richard e. sherwood and brenton l. metzler for appellants. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, james e. sabine, assistant attorney general, and ernest p. goodman, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Full Judgment

ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS - 368 U.S. 3 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 368 U.S. 3 (1961) 368 U.S. 3

ABLEMAN ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 246.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 252 Iowa 948, 108 N. W. 2d 253.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

C. W. Garberson and William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 3, 4


SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., <a href="/100026"> 368 U.S. 3 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 3 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., 368 U.S. 3 (1961) 368 U.S. 3

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 122.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 55 Cal. 2d 407, 359 P.2d 625.

Pierce Works, Warren M. Christopher, Hugo A. Steinmeyer, Richard E. Sherwood and Brenton L. Metzler for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial