Anderson Vs. Ball

Anderson vs Ball

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-23-1961

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100018

CiteSignal

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100018
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-23-1961
Case Number: 368 U.S. 18
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary — not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anderson

Respondent

Ball

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

anderson v. ball - 368 u.s. 18 (1961) u.s. supreme court anderson v. ball, 368 u.s. 18 (1961) 368 u.s. 18 anderson et al. v. ball, county treasurer. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 326. decided october 23, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 21 ill. 2d 396, 172 n. e. 2d 760. charles r. holton for appellants. guy r. williams for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 368 u.s. 18, 19 tinsley v. city of richmond, 368 u.s. 18 (1961) 368 u.s. 18 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court tinsley v. city of richmond, 368 u.s. 18 (1961) 368 u.s. 18 tinsley v. city of richmond. appeal from the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 315. decided october 23, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 202 va. 707, 119 s. e. 2d 488. martin a. martin, thurgood marshall, jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii and charles l. black,

Full Judgment

ANDERSON v. BALL - 368 U.S. 18 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ANDERSON v. BALL, 368 U.S. 18 (1961) 368 U.S. 18

ANDERSON ET AL. v. BALL, COUNTY TREASURER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 326.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 21 Ill. 2d 396, 172 N. E. 2d 760.

Charles R. Holton for appellants.

Guy R. Williams for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 18, 19

TINSLEY v. CITY OF RICHMOND, <a href="/100018"> 368 U.S. 18 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 18 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court TINSLEY v. CITY OF RICHMOND, 368 U.S. 18 (1961) 368 U.S. 18

TINSLEY v. CITY OF RICHMOND.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 315.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 202 Va. 707, 119 S. E. 2d 488.

Martin A. Martin, Thurgood Marshall, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr. for appellant.

J. E. Drinard for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Same Parties Anderson vs Ball Same Subject Land Acquisition