Bowne Vs. Utah

Bowne vs Utah

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-04-1961

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100001

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100001
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-04-1961
Case Number: 368 U.S. 144
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bowne

Respondent

Utah

Excerpt

bowne v. utah - 368 u.s. 144 (1961) u.s. supreme court bowne v. utah, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 bowne v. utah. appeal from the supreme court of utah. no. 169, misc. decided december 4, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 11 utah 2d 95, 355 p.2d 689. george h. searle for appellant. walter l. budge, attorney general of utah, and ronald n. boyce, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. post v. boles, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court post v. boles, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 post v. boles, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia. no. 319, misc. decided december 4, 1961. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. c. donald robertson, attorney general of west virginia, and claude a. joyce and george h. mitchell, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing in the light of uveges v. pennsylvania, 335 u.s. 437 , and herman v. claudy, 350 u.s. 116 . page 368 u.s. 144, 145

Full Judgment

BOWNE v. UTAH - 368 U.S. 144 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court BOWNE v. UTAH, 368 U.S. 144 (1961) 368 U.S. 144

BOWNE v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Utah 2d 95, 355 P.2d 689.

George H. Searle for appellant.

Walter L. Budge, Attorney General of Utah, and Ronald N. Boyce, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

POST v. BOLES, <a href="/100001"> 368 U.S. 144 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 144 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court POST v. BOLES, 368 U.S. 144 (1961) 368 U.S. 144

POST v. BOLES, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 319, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Claude A. Joyce and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing in the light of Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 335 U.S. 437 , and Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116 .

Page 368 U.S. 144, 145

Same Parties Bowne vs Utah Same Subject Land Acquisition