Bare Act Search Results

Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1981 (29 of 1981) Preamble 1

Title: Karnataka Departmental Inquiries Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses, Production of Documents and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1981

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

THE KARNATAKA DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRIES (ENFORCEMENT OF ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT, 19811 [Act, No. 29 of 1981] [10th April, 1981] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for the enforcement of attendance of witnesses and production of documents in certain departmental inquiries and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Whereas it is expedient to provide for the enforcement of attendance of witnesses and production of documents in certain departmental inquiries and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto in the State of Karnataka; Be it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the Thirty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:- ________________________ 1. First published in the Karnataka Gazette Extraordinary on the Fifteenth day of April, 1981.

Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1981 (29 of 1981) Section 5

Title: Power of Authorised Inquiring Authorityto Enforce Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

.....Act 38 of 1959) or any corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970 (Central Act 5 of 1970) or any corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (Central Act 40 of 1980),- (a) to produce any book of account or other documents which the Reserve Bank of India, the State Bank of India, the subsidiary bank or the corresponding new bank claims to be of a confidential nature, or (b) to make any such book or document a part of the record of the proceedings of the departmental inquiry, or (c) to give inspection of any such book or document, if produced, to any party before it or to any other person. (3) Every process issued by an authorised inquiring authority for the attendance of any witnessor for the production of any document shall be served and executed through the District Judge within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the witness or other person, on whom the process is to be served or executed, voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain, and, for the purposes of taking.....

Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1981 (29 of 1981) Complete Act

Title: Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1981 (29 of 1981)

State: Karnataka

Year: 1981

Preamble 1 - KARNATAKA DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRIES ENFORCEMENT OF ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1981 Section 1 - Short title and commencement Section 2 - Departmental inquiries to which the Act shall apply Section 3 - Definitions Section 4 - Power of State Government to authorise the exercise of powers specified in section 5 Section 5 - Power of authorised inquiring authorityto enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents Section 6 - Territorial limits in which powers specified in section 5 may be exercised Section 6A - Issue of search warrant etc. Section 7 - Power to make rules Section 8 - Repeal and savings

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Chapter 10

Title: Of the Examination of Witnesses

State: Central

Year: 1872

.....the discretion of the Court. Section 136 - Judge to decide as to admissibility of evidence When either party proposes to give evidence of any fact, the Judge may ask the party proposing to give the evidence in what manner the alleged fact, if proved, would be relevant; and the Judge shall admit the evidence if he thinks that the fact, if proved, would be relevant, and not otherwise. If the fact proposed to be proved is one of which evidence is admissible only upon proof of some other fact, such last-mentioned fact must be proved before evidence is given of the fact first mentioned, unless the party undertakes to give proof of such fact, and the Court is satisfied with such undertaking. If the relevancy of one alleged fact depends upon another alleged fact being first proved, the Judge may, in his discretion, either permit evidence of the first fact to be given before the second fact is proved, or require evidence to be given of the second fact before evidence is given of the first fact. Illustrations (a) It is proposed to prove a statement about a relevant fact by a person alleged to be dead, which statement is relevant under section 32. The fact that the person.....

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 21

Title: Summoning and Attendance of Witnesses

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....for rule 1A (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 4. Inserted by Act 46 of 1999, section 25(ii) (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 5. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(iii) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 6. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(v), for "under this Order" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 7. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(vi), for sub-rule (1) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 8. Rule 12 renumbered as sub-rule (1) of that rule by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(vii) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 9. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(viii), for "to examine any person other than a party to the suit" (w.e.f. 01.02.1977). 10. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(ix), for "fifty" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 11. Substituted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(ix), for "Two hundred miles" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 12. Added by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(x), (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 13. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 66(vii) (w.e.f. 01.02.1977).

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 19

Title: Hearing of the Suit and Examination of Witnesses

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....has the right to begin unless the defendant admits the facts alleged by the plaintiff and contends that either in point of law or on some additional facts alleged by the defendant the plaintiff is not entitled to any part of the relief which he seeks, in which case the defendant has the right to begin. 2. Statement and production of evidence (1) On the day fixed for the hearing of the suit or on any other day to which the hearing is adjourned, the party having the right to begin shall state his case and produce his evidence in support of the issues which he is bound to prove. (2) The other party shall then state his case and produce his evidence (if any) and may then address the Court generally on the whole case. (3) The party beginning may then reply generally on the whole case. 1 [(3A) Any party may address oral arguments in a case, and shall, before he concludes the oral arguments, if any, submit if the Court so permits concisely and under distinct headings written arguments in support of his case to the Court and such written arguments shall form part of the record. (3B) A copy of such written arguments shall be simultaneously fur­nished to the opposite.....

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Section 116

Title: Remission of Tax in Areas Included or Extended in the Middle of Half-year

State: Karnataka

Year: 1976

.....owner of every building or land in such area shall be entitled,- (a) if the date of such exclusion falls within the first four months of a half-year, to a remission of the whole of the property tax payable in respect thereof for that half-year; and (b) if such date falls within the last four months of a half-year, to a remission of so much, not exceeding a half the property tax payable in respect thereof for that half-year as is proportionate to the number of days in that half-year succeeding such date. (3) No remission shall be granted under sub-section (2) in respect of any building or land unless an application for such remission is made to the Commissioner within three months from the date of the exclusion of the area in which the building or land is situated.

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Chapter 9

Title: Of Witnesses

State: Central

Year: 1872

.....that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure-- (1) Any such communication made in furtherance of any 1 [illegal] purpose; (2) Any fact observed by any barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, in the course of his employment as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his employment. It is immaterial whether the attention of such barrister, 2 [pleader], attorney or vakil was or was not directed to such fact by or no behalf of his client. Explanation.-The obligation staled in this section continues after the employment has ceased. Illustration (a) A, a client, says to B, an attorney--"I have committed forgery and I wish you to defend me". As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose, this communication is protected from disclosure. (b) A, a client, says to B, an attorney--"I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of forged deed on which I request you to sue". This communication, being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure. (c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, an attorney, to defend him. In the course of the proceedings, B.....

The Orissa Disciplinary Proceedings (Summoning of Witnesses & Production of Documents) Act, 1954 Complete Act

State: Orissa

Year: 1954

..... 4. Powers of Inquiring Officer and penalty for disobedience to process- (1) Any Inquiring Officer shall have the same powers in the matter of summoning of witnesses and compelling the production of documents as are conferred upon the Commissioner under Section 8 of the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850 (Act XXXVII of 1850): Provided that all process to cause the attendance of witnesses or production of documents or other compulsory process shall be served through and executed by the District Magistrate or the Sub-divisional Magistrate, as the case may be, in whose jurisdiction the witness or other person resides and on whom such process is to be served. ( 2 ) The provisions of Section 9 of the said Act providing for penalty for disobedience to process shall apply to any process issued by an Inquiring Officer as they apply to such process issued by the Commissioners aforesaid. 5. Rules- The State Government may make rules for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of this Act. Orissa State Acts

Maharashtra Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

..... includes bribery or corruption, and mala fide act of omission or commission; (d) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act. SECTION 04: AUTHORISATION OF INQUIRING AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE POWER SPECIFIED IN SECTION 5 Where in any departmental inquiry, it is necessary to summon as witness, or call for any document from, any person or a class or category of persons, the Inquiring Authority may exercise the power specified in section 5 in relation to any such person or a person within such class or category, at any stage of the departmental inquiry, if he is authorised, by order in writing in this behalf, by such officer not below the rank of a Secretary to Govern ment as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, designate ; and different such officers may be designated for different class or classes of departmental inquiries or for different local areas of the State. SECTION 05: POWER OF AUTHORISE INQUIRING AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS :" (1)Every Inquiring Authority authorised under section 4 (herein after referred to as "the authorised Inquiring Authority") shall have the.....