Skip to content

Bare Act Search Results

Bare Acts + AI

From statute to cited judgments

Trial unlocks Semantic Search and AI Brief on judgments that interpret the acts you are researching.

Competition Act, 2002 Chapter 2

Title: Prohibition of Certain Agreements, Abuse of Dominant Position and Regulation of Combinations

State: Central

Year: 2002

S.O.1241(E) dated 15.05.2009. Section 4 - Prohibition of abuse of dominant position: Abuse of dominant position 4[1[(1) No enterprise or group

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Easements Act, 1882 Section 29

Title: INCREASE OF EASEMENT The dominant owner cannot, by merely altering or adding to the dominant heritage, substantially

State: Central

Year: 1882

SECTION 29: INCREASE OF EASEMENT The dominant owner cannot, by merely altering or adding to the dominant

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Competition Act, 2002 Section 4

Title: Prohibition of Abuse of Dominant Position: Abuse of Dominant Position

State: Central

Year: 2002

4[1[(1) No enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position.] (2) There shall be an abuse of dominant position

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Brief the judgments behind these acts

Competition Act, 2002 Section 27

Title: Orders by Commission After Inquiry into Agreements or Abuse of Dominant Position

State: Central

Year: 2002

in section 3 or action of an enterprise in a dominant position, is in contravention of section 3 or section 4,

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Easements Act, 1882 Section 43

Title: EXTINCTION BY PERMANENT CHANGE IN DOMINANT HERITAGE Where, by, any permanent change in the dominant heritage, the

State: Central

Year: 1882

a) it was intended for the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, to whatever extent the easement should be used; or

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Competition Act, 2002 Section 4

Title: ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION

State: Central

Year: 2002

1) No enterprise shall abuse its dominant position. (2) There shall be an abuse of dominant position

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Easements Act, 1882 Section 43

Title: Extinction by Permanent Change in Dominant Heritage

State: Central

Year: 1882

Where, by, any permanent change in the dominant heritage, the burden on the servient heritage is materially increased

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Easements Act, 1882 Section 38

Title: EXTINCTION BY RELEASE An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or implidly, to the

State: Central

Year: 1882

38: EXTINCTION BY RELEASE An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or implidly, to the servient owner.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Competition Act, 2002 Section 28

Title: DIVISION OF ENTERPRISE ENJOYING DOMINANT POSITION

State: Central

Year: 2002

by order in writing, direct division of an enterprise enjoying dominant position to ensure that such enterprise does not abuse its

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Competition Act, 2002 Section 27

Title: ORDERS BY COMMISSION AFTER INQUIRY INTO AGREEMENTS OR ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION Where after inquiry the Commission

State: Central

Year: 2002

case may be, involved in such agreement, or abuse of dominant position, to discontinue and not to re-enter such agreement or

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI research tools - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial