Skip to content

Statute → case law

See how courts applied this provision

Jump to judgments under this act, then open an AI Brief on any order. Semantic Search helps you ask in plain English.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

TypeBare Act JurisdictionCentral Government

Competition Act, 2002 Section 27

Orders by Commission After Inquiry into Agreements or Abuse of Dominant Position

~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/act/30974

Bare act section · Research

About this section

Competition Act, 2002 Section 27 is part of Competition Act, 2002 - Orders by Commission After Inquiry into Agreements or Abuse of Dominant Position. Read the section text below and explore Indian court judgments that cite it.

Research copy - verify against official government publications before filing or court use.

Section Text

6[Where after inquiry the Commission finds that any agreement referred to in section 3 or action of an enterprise in a dominant position, is in contravention of section 3 or section 4, as the case may be, it may pass all or any of the following orders, namely:--

(a) direct any enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons, as the case may be, involved in such agreement, or abuse of dominant position, to discontinue and not to re-enter such agreement or discontinue such abuse of dominant position, as the case may be;

(b) impose such penalty, as it may deem fit which shall be not more than ten per cent. of the average of the turnover for the last three preceding financial years, upon each of such person or enterprises which are parties to such agreements or abuse:

1[Provided that in case any agreement referred to in section 3 has been entered into by a cartel, the Commission may impose upon each producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in that cartel, a penalty of up to three times of its profit for each year of the continuance of such agreement or ten per cent, of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]

2[* * *]

(d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the Commission;

(e) direct the enterprises concerned to abide by such other orders as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any;

3[* * *]

(g) pass such other 4[order or issue such directions] as it may deem fit.

5[Provided that while passing orders under this section, if the Commission comes to a finding, that an enterprise in contravention to section 3 or section 4 of the Act is a member of a group as defined in clause (b) of the Explanation to section 5 of the Act, and other members of such a group are also responsible for, or have contributed to, such a contravention, then it may pass orders, under this section, against such members of the group.]]

__________________________________________

1. Proviso substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to substitution it read as:

"Provided that in case any agreement referred to in section 3has been entered into by any cartel, the Commission shall impose upon each producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in that cartel, a penalty equivalent to three times of the amount of profits made out of such agreement by the cartel or ten per cent, of the average of the turnover of the cartel for the last preceding three financial years, whichever is higher;"

2. Clause (c) omitted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to omission it read as:

"(c) award compensation to parties in accordance with the provisions contained in section 34;"

3. Clause (f) omitted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to omission it read as:

"(f) recommend to the Central Government for the division of an enterprise enjoying dominant position;"

4. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the word "order".

5. Proviso inserted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007].

6. Effective date :20th May 2009- notified vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification No S.O.1241(E) dated 15.05.2009.

Frequently asked questions

What does Competition Act, 2002 Section 27 provide?

Section Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Orders by Commission After Inquiry into Agreements or Abuse of Dominant Position) is reproduced on this page as part of the Competition Act, 2002. Lawyers and researchers use it to read the statutory wording before checking how courts have applied this section in reported judgments.

How do I find judgments on Competition Act, 2002 Section 27?

Open “Find citing judgments” on this page to search Supreme Court, High Court, and tribunal decisions that reference Competition Act, 2002 Section 27. Advanced act search can narrow results by court, year, or additional act filters.

Is the section text on SooperKanoon official?

SooperKanoon hosts bare act text for research and quick reference. For filings or compliance in Central, confirm the wording against the official state gazette or authorized publication.

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial