Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: actionable claim Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 175 results (0.013 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialThe Sikkim Value Added Tax Act, 2000 Complete Act
State: Sikkim
Year: 2000
.....Additional, Joint, Deputy and Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes appointed under section 3; (ix) "Central Act" means the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Act 74 of 1956); (x) "Contractee" means any person for whom or for whose benefit a works contract is executed; (xi) "Contractor" means any person who executes, either himself or through a subcontractor, a works contract; (xii) "dealer" means any person who, whether regularly or otherwise, in the course of business buys, sells, supplies, distributes or does anything incidental to such buying, selling, supplying or distributing of goods, directly or indirectly, whether for cash or for deferred payment or for commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration and includes; (a) a casual trader; (b) a commission agent, a broker or a delcredere agent or an auctioneer or any other mercantile agent, by whatever name called, (c) a non-resident dealer or an agent of a non-resident dealer or a local branch of a firm or company or association or body of persons whether incorporated or not, situated outside the State; (d) a person who, whether in the course of business or not, - (i) sells goods produced by him by.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Jharkhand Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2000 Complete Act
State: Jharkhand
Year: 2000
.....of tenants (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any contract or law to the contrary but subject to the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947), and to those of Section 18, where a tenant is in possession of any building, he shall not be liable to eviction there from except in execution of a decree passed by the Court on one or more of the following grounds:- (a) for breach of the conditions of the tenancy, or for sub-letting the building or any portion thereof without the consent of the landlord, or if he is an employee of the landlord occupying the building as an employee, on his ceasing to be in such employment; (b) where the condition of the building has materially deteriorated owing to acts of waste by, or negligence or default of the tenant or of any person residing with the tenant or for whose behaviour the tenant is responsible; (c) where the building is reasonably and in good faith required by the landlord for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the building is held by the landlord: Provided that where the Court thinks that the reasonable requirement of such occupation may be substantially.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Western Orissa Development Council Act, 2000 Complete Act
State: Orissa
Year: 2000
.....if he- a. is found, in performance of his functions under this Act, to have exceeded or abused his powers; or b. refuses to act or is incapable of acting or acts in a manner which the Government consider to be prejudicial to the interests and objects of the Council: Provided that no action shall be taken under this sub-section without giving the person concerned an opportunity to show cause against the proposed action; and (3-a) The Government may at any time, by an order published in the Gazette, withdraw the nomination of a member nominated on the Council and, upon such nomination being withdrawn, he shall Cease to be a member of the Council from the date of publication of the order. 4. When the office of a member including the Chairman becomes vacant by his resignation, removal death or otherwise, the vacancy shall be filled up in the same manner in which he was taken. 5. The Chairman of Council shall enjoy the status of a Minister of State of Orissa and shall be entitled to such remuneration and allowances as may be prescribed. 6. The Other members of the Council excluding the Revenue Divisional Commissioner and the Chief Executive Officer, shall be paid such fees.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMadhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act,2000 Section 51
Title: Liability in Respect of Actionable Wrong
State: Central
Year: 2000
Where, immediately before the appointed day, the existing State of Madhya Pradesh is subject to any liability in respect of any actionable wrong other than breach of contract, that liability shall.-- (a) if the cause of action arose wholly within the territories which, as from that day. are the territories of either of the successor States of Madhya Pradesh or Chhattisgarh, be a liability of that successor State; and (b) in any other case, be initially a liability of the State of Madhya Pradesh, but subject to such financial adjustment as may be agreed upon between the States of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh or, in default of such agreement, as the Central Government may, by order, direct.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 Section 55
Title: Liability in Respect of Actionable Wrong
State: Central
Year: 2000
Where, immediately before the appointed day, the existing State of Bihar is subject to any liability in respect of any actionable wrong other than breach of contract, that liability shall,-- (a) if the cause of action arose wholly within the territories which, as from that day, are the territories of either of the successor States of Bihar or Jharkhand, be a liability of that successor State; and (b) in any other case, be initially a liability.of the State of Bihar, but subject to such financial adjustment as may be agreed upon between the States of Bihar and Jharkhand or, in default of such agreement, as the Central Government may, by order, direct.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionUttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 Section 56
Title: Liability in Respect of Actionable Wrong
State: Central
Year: 2000
Where, immediately before the appointed day, the existing State of Uttar Pradesh is subject to any liability in respect of any actionable wrong other than breach of contract, that liability shall,-- (a) if the cause of action arose wholly within the territories which, as from that day, are the territories of either of the successor States of Uttar Pradesh or Uttaranchal, be a liability of that successor State; and (b) in any other case, be initially a liability of the State of Uttar Pradesh, but subject to such financial adjustment as may be agreed upon between the States of Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal or, in default of such agreement, as the Central Government may, by order, direct.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionChemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 Section 52
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Central
Year: 2000
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Central Government or a State Government or any officer of the Central Government or of a State Government or the Chairperson, Directors, officers and other employees of the National Authority or any other person exercising any powers or discharging any functions or performing any duties under this Act, for anything in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or any rule or order made thereunder.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Koragas (Prohibition of Ajalu Practice) Act, 2000 Section 5
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
No suit, prosecution, or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Government or any person for any thing which is done or intended to be done in good faith under this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionControl of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 27
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the State Government or any officer or authority of the State Government for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act or any rule made there under or any order issued under any such rule.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionChemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 Section 49
Title: Prosecution of Offences
State: Central
Year: 2000
No court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Act except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or the authority notified by the Central Government, in the Official Gazette, to be competent to sanction prosecution of the offences under this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial