Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: actionable claim Sorted by: recent Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 175 results (0.013 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialThe Sikkim Value Added Tax Act, 2000 Complete Act
State: Sikkim
Year: 2000
.....Additional, Joint, Deputy and Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes appointed under section 3; (ix) "Central Act" means the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Act 74 of 1956); (x) "Contractee" means any person for whom or for whose benefit a works contract is executed; (xi) "Contractor" means any person who executes, either himself or through a subcontractor, a works contract; (xii) "dealer" means any person who, whether regularly or otherwise, in the course of business buys, sells, supplies, distributes or does anything incidental to such buying, selling, supplying or distributing of goods, directly or indirectly, whether for cash or for deferred payment or for commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration and includes; (a) a casual trader; (b) a commission agent, a broker or a delcredere agent or an auctioneer or any other mercantile agent, by whatever name called, (c) a non-resident dealer or an agent of a non-resident dealer or a local branch of a firm or company or association or body of persons whether incorporated or not, situated outside the State; (d) a person who, whether in the course of business or not, - (i) sells goods produced by him by.....
List Judgments citing this sectionControl of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 23
Title: Presumption as to Offences Under Section 3
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
(1) In a prosecution for an offence of organized crime punishable under section 3, if it is proved. - (a) That unlawful arms and other material including documents or papers were recovered from possession of the accused and there is reason to believe that such unlawful arms and other material including documents or papers were used in the commission of such offence; or (b) That the evidence of an expert, the finger prints of the accused were found at the site of the offence or on anything including unlawful arms and other material including documents or papers and vehicle used in connection with the commission of such offence, the Special Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the accused had committed such offence. (2) In a prosecution for an offence of organized crime punishable under sub-section (2) of section 3, if it is proved that the accused provided any financial assistance to a person accused of, or reasonably suspected of, an offence of organized crime, the Special Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that such person has committed the offence under the said sub-section (2).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState Universities Act, 2000 (29 of 2001) Chapter XII
Title: University Review Commission
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....on the recommendations as he deems fit. (6) The State Government shall lay a copy of the recommendations together with a memorandum indicating the action taken before both Houses of the State Legislature. Section 72 - Karnataka State Inter-University Board (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, there shall be an Inter University Board for the State of Karnataka called "the Karnataka State Inter-University Board" consisting of the following members:- (a) the Minister incharge of Higher Education -Chairman; (b) the Vice-Chancellors of all the Universities in the State; (c) the Secretary to Government incharge of Higher Education-Member-Secretary; (d) the Secretary to Government, in charge of Finance Department; (e) the Secretary to Government, in charge of Agriculture and Horticulture Department; (f) the Secretary to Government, Planning Department; (g) the Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department in-charge of Medical Education; (h) the Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department; (i) the commissioner for Collegiate Education; (j) the Director of Technical Education; (k) the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState Universities Act, 2000 (29 of 2001) Section 71
Title: Appointment of University Review Commission
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
(1) The Chancellor shall once in every five years constitute a Commission to review the working of the University and make recommendations. (2) The Commission shall consist of not less than three eminent educationists, one of whom shall be the Chairman, appointed by the Chancellor on the recommendation of the State Government. (3) The terms and conditions of appointment of the members shall be such as the Chancellor may, determine. (4) The commission shall, after holding such enquiry as it deems fit, make its recommendations to the Chancellor and to the State Government. (5) The Chancellor may, in consultation with the State Government, take such action on the recommendations as he deems fit. (6) The State Government shall lay a copy of the recommendations together with a memorandum indicating the action taken before both Houses of the State Legislature.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState Universities Act, 2000 (29 of 2001) Chapter XIV
Title: Miscellaneous and Transitory Provisions
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....which by this Act are to be exercised or performed by any Authority of the University until such authority comes into existence as provided by this Act. Section 85 - Power to remove difficulties (1) If any difficulty arises as to the first constitution or reconstitution of any authority of the University or giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the State Government may by notification, make such provision not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as may appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty: Provided that no such notification shall be issued after the expiry of five years from the date of commencement of this Act. (2) Every notification issued under sub-section (1) shall be laid as soon as may be after it is issued, before each House of the State Legislature while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more sessions, and if before the expiry of the said period, either House of the State Legislature makes any modification in any notification or directs that any notification shall not have effect, and if the modification or direction is agreed to by the other House,.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionState Universities Act, 2000 (29 of 2001) Section 79
Title: Protection of Act Done in Good Faith
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against and no damages shall be claimed from, the University or its authorities, bodies or officers for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act, the Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations or Rules made thereunder.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRight to Information Act, 2000 Section 4
Title: Right to Information
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....under this clause refer the matter to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Secretariat or the Karnataka Legislative Council Secretariat, as the case may be for determination of the issues and act according to the advice tendered by the Secretariat: Provided further that in computing the period of fifteen working days under sub-section (2) of section 5 for the purpose of this clause, the time required for determination of issues under the first proviso shall be excluded. (g) information regarding trade or commercial secrets protected by law or information, the disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the legitimate economic and commercial interest or the competitive position of a public authority; or would cause unfair gain or loss to any person; (h) information regarding any matter which is likely to,- (i) help or facilitate escape from legal custody or affect prison security; or (ii) impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRight to Information Act, 2000 Section 9
Title: Penalties
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
Where any competent authority, without any reasonable cause fails to supply information sought for within the period specified under section 5 or furnishes information which is false with regard to any material particulars and which it knows or has reasonable cause to believe it to be false,- (i) the authority immediately superior to the competent authority may impose a penalty not exceeding two thousand rupees on such competent authority as it thinks appropriate after giving him a reasonable opportunity of being heard and such a penalty shall be recoverable from his salary or if no salary is drawn as arrears of land revenue; and (ii) he shall also be liable to disciplinary action under the service rules applicable to him.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRight to Information Act, 2000 Section 13
Title: Repeal and Savings
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
(1) The Karnataka Right to Information Ordinance, 2000 (Karnataka Ordinance No. 9 of 2000) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionControl of Organized Crimes Acts, 2000 Section 14
Title: Authorization of Interception of Wire, Electronic or Oral Communication
State: Karnataka
Year: 2000
.....investigating or law enforcement officer making the application and the head of the department authorizing the application; (b) A statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant, to justify his belief that an order should be issued including- (i) Details as to the offence of organized crime that has been, is being or is about to be committed; (ii) A particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; (iii) A particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; and (iv) The identity of the person, if known, committing the offence of organized crime and whose communications is to be intercepted; (c) A statement as to whether or not other modes of enquiry or intelligence gathering have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous or is likely to expose the identity of those connected with the operation of interception; (d) A statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained, if the nature of the enquiry is such that the authorization.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial